Chapter One
Key Words to know for this chapter
Tzadik (pl. tzadikim): Commonly used to describe a person who lives a moral life as prescribed by Torah. In this chapter, however, we discover that this definition will not suffice.
Rasha (pl. resha’im): Commonly used to describe someone who acts immorally. The opposite of a tzadik. Here too, we will find that simple definitions will not suffice.
Beinoni (pl. beinonim): Literally, a person in-between the tzadik and the rasha. Generally understood as someone who is neither perfect in observance of mitzvahs, nor morally corrupt. Again, that turns out to be unsatisfactory.
Kelipah (pl. kelipot): Literally, “shell” or “husk.” Used in Zohar almost interchangeably with the word “evil.” The connection is simple: Evil exists when the divine flow of energy is obstructed and distorted by the kelipot, just as a shell obstructs the consumption of a fruit or nut. By discarding the kelipah, we reveal that divine light and heal our world.
Sitra Achra: Literally, “the other side.” A term from Zohar, it often appears alongside the word kelipah. This is the realm of anything and everything that is not within the realm of the divine. There is no neutral ground. It is the dominant state of the world at present, prior to our work with it.
Introduction
At the dawn of modernity, Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov (1698–1760) came to awaken the smoldering ashes of darkened hearts, to breathe life back into the dry bones of a nation weary from persecution, and to lift from the ground a people buckling under the burden of Torah observance they had carried for so many thousands of years. He came to show us once again that we are all capable of serving G‑d with love and joy, and that every activity of life is an opportunity for oneness with the divine.
He declared that the heartfelt prayers of a simple Jewish wagon-driver were treasured by G‑d at least as much as the Talmudic studies of the most brilliant scholars. He quoted the words of the Talmud, “G‑d desires the heart,” meaning that whatever a Jew does – whether it be Talmud study, an act of charity, a prayer to G‑d – all had to be done with joy and with love.
The advent of the Baal Shem Tov was a watershed in Jewish history, a rebirth and revolution for the Jewish spirit. All those that he touched through his parables and teachings felt as though they had just crossed through the parting of the sea with Moses.
But he wrote no books. Neither did any of his disciples organize a cohesive whole from the teachings they had heard from his mouth.
That he left for Rabbi Schneur Zalman of Liadi, a disciple of a disciple. As the old order of Europe began to collapse and the status of the common man and woman started to rise, he wrote this book we call Tanya, a book not for the enlightened sage or the lofty soul, but for the rest of us.
Tanya was the first everyman’s guide to Chassidic thought and practice. Beforehand, a Jew would have to either receive these teachings orally or peer into one of the anthologies of cryptic aphorisms, anecdotes, and wisdom-teachings. From these you could gain some idea of what the Baal Shem Tov believed every Jew could and must achieve. But no one had attempted to map out the journey a Jew must take to get there.
This is the purpose of Tanya. In it, Rabbi Schneur Zalman shows you how to scale the mountains that loom along your path, sidestep the pitfalls scattered along the road, and, most importantly, keep your soul active, awake, inspired, and alert–because as long as your divine soul is awake, nothing could possibly stand in your way, not even your own inner beast. Every mitzvah you do will be a joyful mitzvah, and all of life a love affair between you and your Creator.
A likely starting point for such a book would be a description of this journey on which you are about to embark. Or perhaps some words of inspiration or purpose. Strangely, instead, the Tanya begins with a dissection of Talmudic dictums and terminology.
There is a reason for this, and it touches on a crucial distinction between the goals of the Tanya and those of other Jewish ethical works: Most other works construct their guidance upon well-established foundations. In the Tanya, Rabbi Schneur Zalman re-examines those foundations and provides an entirely new understanding of their meaning.
In the first chapter, he investigates the building blocks of Torah’s values and their very fiber, namely, the words it uses to describe the playing field. These are the goalposts that were set for you before you were born, a life-defining oath you took before your journey began: Be a tzadik. Don’t be a rasha.
But what is a tzadik? What is a rasha? Are these behavioral terms measured by deeds and misdeeds, or are they inner states of being? Do they lie on two ends of a one-dimensional pole, distributed along a spectrum, or perhaps imply a multidimensional constellation as befits the diversity of human life?
R. Schneur Zalman examines how these words are used in the contexts that matter. Halachah demands a clear definition of a rasha, since the testimony of a rasha is not accepted in court. But crucial, definitive passages from Zohar and Midrash illuminating the topic challenge these notions. The entire spectrum of Torah wisdom is invoked, from the most pragmatic to the most abstract and mysterious.
By the time we are halfway through the first chapter, the goalposts have been moved, the field expanded into a whole new realm, and all our preconceptions have been shattered. It becomes clear that these terms are structured around something far more complex and more essential to the human experience than our external behavior, something that cannot be explained without prefacing an analysis of the structure of the human psyche and its struggles.
From this point on, each chapter provides yet another re-examination of these core structures, reframing and restructuring them, presenting yet another revolution in our concept of life’s purpose and meaning, turning upside-down and inside-out basic, universal notions.
Many classic works of Jewish ethics that preceded the Tanya provide a good argument for shifting focus towards the inner world of the Jew. The Tanya, on the other hand, forces us into a system-wide reset of the fundamentals: Who are we? What is Torah? What do we mean when we say “G‑d”? How do G‑d, the Torah, and the Jew fit together?
In this restructuring, the Tanya reaches to the core foundations of the Jew. Not just to your heart, but to the divine soul hidden deep within its recesses. It’s not your hands that must do the mitzvah. But neither is it your emotions, or your mind, for that matter. It has to be you, from your innermost.
You, and not your habits. You, and not your nurture. You, and not your nature. You, at your core-essence, a divine soul.
Your Promise
Tzadik, Rasha, Beinoni
The Zohar also states that the higher level of tzadik is a complete tzadik because there is no bad inside him at all. It would follow that the converse should be true with the complete rasha – he has no good inside him.
This seems to mean that the behavior of tzadikim and resha’im is governed by a single impulse, while beinonim waver back and forth.
There, the Talmud continues:
Seeking the Beinoni
The True Tzadik
R. Schneur Zalman has now methodically eliminated the definition of a beinoni as a halfway stage between good and bad behavior.
This compels us to look deeper at what the Torah is asking of us. If the Torah was only concerned with behavior, we could assign everyone a position along a one-dimensional line stretching from those who do many mitzvahs and never sin to those who do many sins and have no mitzvahs, with possibly a third, vague middle area.
But we’ve established that the in-between category is not a midpoint between two extremes of behavior. Behaviorally speaking, you’re either a rasha or a tzadik.
Furthermore, Rabba – obviously a tzadik – teaches his students that he is a beinoni. He’s not feigning modesty – he’s teaching Torah and telling matters as he perceives them. That tells us that the beinoni and the tzadik are behaviorally indistinguishable.
It must be, then, that what separates the tzadik from the beinoni is some internal state of being and that a Jew’s focus in life lies beyond good behavior. This is what we will begin explaining now.
Before continuing, let’s clarify the general direction that we’re heading.
The first issue raised in this chapter remains unresolved: How are you expected to consider yourself a rasha when that is both forbidden and perilous? This is a fundamental question about the crippling self-blame that seems unavoidable as soon as we set any moral standard.
We’ve established that a rasha is anyone who has failed to keep up to the standards set by the Torah, a beinoni is someone who never fails those standards, and a tzadik is a very rare person who has no impulse to do the wrong thing. We don’t yet have clarity on these three categories, and neither have we established a distinction between the two kinds of rasha and the two kinds of tzadik.
The second half of this chapter doesn’t address either of these issues directly. Instead, it starts to unfold a map of the human psyche. You have two souls. The first of them is innately self-centered. The second soul is the subject of the next chapter.
More Than One Soul
Notes
- Sanhedrin 106b. See Zohar II, 281b.
- Notable amongst the early printed works compiling the oral teachings of the early Chassidic masters are: R. Yaakov Yosef of Polnoye, Ben Porat Yosef (Korets, Ukraine: 1781); R. Dov Ber of Mezritch (as recorded by his disciples), Magid D’Varav L’Yaakov (Korets, Ukraine: 1791); R. Yisrael ben Eliezer, the Baal Shem Tov (as recorded by his disciples), Tzava’at HaRivash (Zhovkva, Ukraine: 1793); Keter Shem Tov (Zhovkva, Ukraine: 1794–1795), 2 vols.
- See, for example, R. Bachye ibn Paquda, introduction to Chovot HaLevavot.
- Nidah 30b.
- Avot 2:13; R. Obadiah Bartenura, ad loc., citing Rambam.
- See Deuteronomy 28:47; Tanya, ch. 26.
- Berachot 7a; 61b.
- Berachot 7a.
- Zohar II, 117b.
- Berachot 61b.
- The Hebrew text concludes with “and etcetera.” It is likely that the author is referencing the consequent account in some editions of the Talmud, in which Rabba responds to Abaye, “A person knows himself whether he is a tzadik or not.” This strengthens the question: How could Rabba sincerely believe he was half-full of sins? (The Rebbe, R. Menachem M. Schneerson, Igrot Kodesh, vol. 3, pp. 61ff.)
- Baba Batra 16a.
- Nidah 16b.
- Baba Metzia 86a.
- Kidushin 49b. See Pesachim 8a; Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Edut 12:3; Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 34:28. “Completely”: see Ohr Zarua, sec. 112.
- Talmud, Yebamoth 20a; Nidah 12a.
- Talmud, Shavuot 39b.
- Talmud, Sanhedrin 99a; Deuteronomy 15:31.
- See, for example, Rashi and Tosafot, Rosh Hashanah 16b; Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Teshuva, ch. 3.
- Talmud, Berachot 61b; Psalms 109:22.
- Jerusalem Talmud, Sotah 5:5; Korban HaEdah, ad loc.
- 1 Samuel 2:8.
- Talmud, Yoma 38b; Proverbs 10:25.
- Vol. 1, portal 1–2.
- Isaiah 57:16.
- Leviticus 17:11.
- Talmud, Yebamoth 79a.
- Torah Ohr, 5b–6a; Torat Chaim, pp. 30a–33b.
- Tikunei Zohar, tikun 6.
- Proverbs 14:34.
- Baba Batra 10b.
- Midrash Rabbah, Numbers 13:15; Zohar I, 47b; III, 20a; 216a.

